Animal Research Alternatives
|
Many areas of biomedical research focus on the study of human-specific diseases and medical concerns for which induced animal models are seldom, if ever, appropriate or scientifically relevant. This largely reflects obvious species-specific differences in anatomy, biochemistry, physiology, pharmacokinetics, and toxic responses. Use of replacement alternative methods, especially incorporating human cells and tissues, avoids such confounding variables. A specific example of a basic research alternative method, and one that potentially has saved up to one million animals, is the in vitro production of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), which are used in nearly every field of biomedical research and critical areas of clinical practice. The widely-used ascites method of producing MAbs, involves injecting cells into rodent abdominal cavities and is extremely painful and unnecessary. AAVS filed a petition with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 1997 requesting that the agency prohibit its researchers from using the ascites method to produce MAbs. As a result of this and a scientific workshop sponsored by AAVS affiliate, the Alternatives Research & Development Foundation, that illustrated international support for in vitro production of MAbs, the NIH changed its policy to state that its researchers and those who receive funding from NIH must use in vitro alternatives as the default method for MAb production. Examples of Animal Research Alternatives Used in the United States
|

